Am 09.12.2014 um 21:25 schrieb Pete Travis:
Lets say I do have an understanding of network basics, just for the sake of argument. I share my application with you. The application is intended to listen on the network, you know this and want the application for that purpose. You run the application, it tries to listen to a network port. Magick, prayers, and the ghost of Charles Babbage - or maybe some hypothetical dbus service- does *something* to find out if you really wanted that. You did. Neither one of us is is made incompetent by the convenience.
i did not say that nor is anything i said in that thread meant abusive
Here's the thing: firewalld will let this happen. at here is a dbus interface. Thomas has proven more than willing to accommodate RFEs. Nobody is asking for changes that would solve the problem of frustrated users or developers encountering firewall restrictions. The GNOME folks don't want the UX compromise of rote-clicked dialogs. Nobody else is suggesting an alternative implementation that actually *improves* the Fedora experience. Ideas get more traction than complaints
that's true*but* if i do not have a idea to make things really better with all side-effects i hestitate to change the current behavior until i have a good idea
the opposite happened with the change of this topic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
