On Dec 9, 2014 10:54 AM, "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9 December 2014 at 10:46, Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/12/14 18:39, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9 December 2014 at 10:27, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> [cut]
>>
>>> OS X's firewall is disabled by default. Where's the outcry?
>>>
>>>
>>> It was a long time ago and it basically caused it to have extra
>>> configurations before it could be 'ok'd' for various corporate and
>>> government sites. Not something Fedora Workstation is aiming at.
>>
>>
>> Hm... has anyone a feeling about how such entities would react to the current firewall defaults (open for user ports)? Do we care?
>
>
> Same way, and we do not care for this release. Later releases can be dealt with when they come about.
>
> In the end, this is a tempest in a teapot. The release is out and it is done. I don't like it, but my yelling and screaming and spitting in an autistic rage did not fix it so its time to move on so that is what I am going to do.
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
>
> --
This discussion would resolve quickly if we had video proof of your antics, smooge :)
But seriously, there's an implication in this thread that there will be work happening to give stuff a path to ask for an open port. Where can we follow along with that effort? Starting with, say, how I might change `nikola runserver` or `django-admin runserver` to ask for the port, and ending with the resulting UI that asks me for approval?
If we want actual progress, it doesn't happen because of controversial compromises, or mailing list flamewars, or even GNOME-specific UI responses to dbus signals. We're all here talking about it - let's talk about what would be ideal, and start pointing at the code to make it work.
--Pete
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
