On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 22:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core > package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you can forever more push > any old stuff you want into Fedora, without going back and consulting > with the community and FESCo. Without what? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ckremoval <--- logind https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ServicesPrivateTmp <-- privatetmp https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove <--- /usr move (as noted, not really part of systemd, but just to demonstrate it was properly reviewed) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework <--- systemd use for login manager selection (replacing prefdm) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets <--- presets https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/tmp-on-tmpfs <-- /tmp on tmpfs (ditto) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdCalendarTimers https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdLightweightContainers https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdMessageCatalog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdPredictableNetworkInterfaceNames https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemdResourceControl (a whole bunch of F19 features) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/ChangeSet#No_Default_Syslog <-- no rsyslog in @core also note that FESCo explicitly reserves the power to require particular changes in Fedora to go through the Feature/Change process, and therefore can initiate review of any systemd-related changes that concern them. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
