Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 30 janvier 2014 à 12:28 -0800, Dan Mashal a écrit :

> In fact, why don't we take this to a vote instead of arguing about it
> on this list? Why don't make this a Fedora elections issue?

for the same reasons as usual, ie practical ones, like voting mean
deciding who vote, ie, only board, fesco, all people in the packager
group, all people with a FAS, anybody that come ?

And for philosophical reasons like the simple fact that voting is
divisive and that's going against the idea of building a consensus. 


-- 
Michael Scherer

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux