Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:08:16AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
> The relationship between Red Hat and Fedora is very different from that of for instance Debian and Ubuntu,
> with Red Hat being a lot more directly involved in both contributing to Fedora and paying for the
> general upkeep of Fedora. Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big part of
> what made Fedora interesting.

  Yes, but please don't paint Red Hat bussiness goals as "Fedora community goals".
There is some intersection, but not equality.

-- 
Tomasz Torcz       ,,(...) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.''
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx                      -- Mitchell Blank on LKML

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux