Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:58:22 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps.  I think
> they have value to people.  I think they fill a niche, however large
> or small it might be.  I also think they can be done by the people
> wishing to provide them without relying on Fedora resources for
> hosting and creation (outside of leveraging existing packages and
> repositories).

That doesn't sound right, 
logically below would also be true.
Gnome is a fairly big Spin,
and can eat up quite a lot of resources.
Maybe it should be outsourced.


___
Regards,
Frank 
www.frankly3d.com

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux