Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big
> part of
> > what made Fedora interesting.
>
>   Yes, but please don't paint Red Hat bussiness goals as "Fedora
> community goals". There is some intersection, but not equality.

I would love to see alt Desktops stay,
but at the end of the day.
The old saying comes to mind:
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/he-who-pays-the-piper-calls-the-tune

That's a fact of life in any business relationship.
Well, but it's not only about money and a lot of contributors use their spare time to contribute, so I wouldn't stress this money thing too much.

 




___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux