On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosowski@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another point: it shouldn't be hardwired into the package manager but > rather result from package properties. I can see several ways to do it: > - an 'essentiality' property in the RPM file > - a yum/dnf configuration file specifying a set of protected packages > - a special, unremovable 'system' package that depends on kernel and dnf YAGNI? Abstractions are useful only when we actually have a difference to abstract. (Perhaps we will have that difference with Fedora.next, but we don't seem to have it now.) Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct