Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Przemek Klosowski
<przemek.klosowski@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another point:  it shouldn't be hardwired into the package manager but
> rather result from package properties. I can see several ways to do it:
>  - an 'essentiality' property in the RPM file
>  - a yum/dnf configuration file specifying a set of protected packages
>  - a special, unremovable 'system' package that depends on kernel and dnf
YAGNI?  Abstractions are useful only when we actually have a
difference to abstract.  (Perhaps we will have that difference with
Fedora.next, but we don't seem to have it now.)
     Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux