Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 05.01.2014 12:21, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 12:16:36 +0100
> "Lars E. Pettersson" <lars@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Ah, did not know that, if you try to auto complete yum only remove
>> shows up, but erase also works. So perhaps erase was an afterthought,
>> to mimic the rpm behavior. If rpm has erase, and yum also can use
>> erase, perhaps erase is the way to go, perhaps...? :)
> 
> Maybe remove was for @debian people used to  "apt-get remove"?

and if developers would be more pragmatic and user-friendly this
wouöd not be discussed a single second and both supported

the time which was used to explain why could have been used for implement the alias

why?
"why not?" should be the real question

both are clear words and if both are supported it would not matter
if "erase" is logical for user A or "remove" for user B



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux