Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Jeu 7 novembre 2013 15:19, Josh Boyer a écrit :

> So if we call containerized apps "Appers" and host it somewhere on
> Fedora infrastructure and tell people about it, you'd be totally OK
> with that?

I think that would remove a lot of the emotion in this thread.

>  People seem to already be jumping to conclusions that
> Appers are going to somehow magically be THE WAY we deliver software,
> but yet nobody had the same thoughts around Coprs.

Maybe that's because Coprs were never announced with huge rants about
market-share and how Fedora packaging sucked and was irrelevant?

> The blinders involved here are pretty large.

It's not blinders it's the natural reaction of people to tactless
pronouncements and dismissals. I do wish the people complaining about this
list focused more on technical aspects and less on hype or
we-ll-decide-somewhere-else-even-though-it-concerns-you.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux