Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> that's all true but you can be pretty sure if a "app-store" with >> bundeled applications exists *nobody* would package and maintain >> them as RPM -> everybody would point with his finger to the app > > No because RPM packages apps *do* have benifits .. otherwise we > wouldn't have this discussion. > >> if it goes in that direction, and it starts faster than anybody likes >> you do a dramatical harm to the userbase which likes the consistent >> package managment and *really used* conecpt of shared libraries > > Again those are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. You can have sandboxed *and* > rpm packaged apps at the same time. the most imporant word in your answer is *CAN* but you will not, nobody will package whatever application as RPM if he is fine with the app-store, so you *could* have both but i doubt at the end of the day it will happen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
