On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01: >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> that's all true but you can be pretty sure if a "app-store" with >>> bundeled applications exists *nobody* would package and maintain >>> them as RPM -> everybody would point with his finger to the app >> >> No because RPM packages apps *do* have benifits .. otherwise we >> wouldn't have this discussion. >> >>> if it goes in that direction, and it starts faster than anybody likes >>> you do a dramatical harm to the userbase which likes the consistent >>> package managment and *really used* conecpt of shared libraries >> >> Again those are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. You can have sandboxed *and* >> rpm packaged apps at the same time. > > the most imporant word in your answer is *CAN* > > but you will not, nobody will package whatever application > as RPM if he is fine with the app-store, so you *could* > have both but i doubt at the end of the day it will happen And I disagree ... but there is a way to find out ... lets try and see ;) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
