On 04.11.2013 21:03, drago01 wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01: >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> that's all true but you can be pretty sure if a "app-store" with >>>> bundeled applications exists *nobody* would package and maintain >>>> them as RPM -> everybody would point with his finger to the app >>> >>> No because RPM packages apps *do* have benifits .. otherwise we >>> wouldn't have this discussion. >>> >>>> if it goes in that direction, and it starts faster than anybody likes >>>> you do a dramatical harm to the userbase which likes the consistent >>>> package managment and *really used* conecpt of shared libraries >>> >>> Again those are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. You can have sandboxed *and* >>> rpm packaged apps at the same time. >> >> the most imporant word in your answer is *CAN* >> >> but you will not, nobody will package whatever application >> as RPM if he is fine with the app-store, so you *could* >> have both but i doubt at the end of the day it will happen > > And I disagree ... but there is a way to find out ... lets try and see ;) > After all there are other Linux distributions, so let's see if Fedora survives this experiment. ;-) Mateusz Marzantowicz -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct