Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Dim 3 novembre 2013 19:34, drago01 a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> since it is a free operating system it does not need to be commerical
>> successfull and so it needs to satisfy it's *existing* and potential
>> userbase
>> but not obsessive attrative for *everybody*
>
>
> No. If you loose to the competion you become irrelevant which means
> less / no support from third parties, less (new) contributors etc etc.

The competition worked hard at API stability. Even abandoned experiments
like silverlight are going to work identically for years in new os
versions.

GNOME decided to break it all the time (can't even get extensions work
from one gnome-shell version to the next one and no gracefully disabling
is still functional breakage).

And thus it 'lost to the competition'. No amount of indirection and
sandboxing is going to hide the utter lack of regard for stability of our
core desktop project

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux