Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:45:13 +0100
"Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...snip...

> 
> It's not blinders it's the natural reaction of people to tactless
> pronouncements and dismissals. I do wish the people complaining about
> this list focused more on technical aspects and less on hype or
> we-ll-decide-somewhere-else-even-though-it-concerns-you.

Thats one thing that puzzles me about this thread... this is all from: 

"Work towards a system where applications can be installed inside a
container to improve security and simplify compatibility through
library bundling"

Which basically says that the working group is going to work on that.
There's actually 0 technical details on how the implemetation will work
out, or even if it will. 

Perhaps we could move this back to productive and suggest that the
working group amend their PRD to have something like: 

"Investigate the implementation and usage for application containers"
and then we can discuss details when there actually are some? 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux