Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:45:13PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Maybe that's because Coprs were never announced with huge rants about
> market-share and how Fedora packaging sucked and was irrelevant?

I'm pretty sure you're misunderstanding what people are saying if you
think above. What I wrote might be understood like above, but that's not
what I meant at all. Suggest to reread what people wrote.

A few comments to make it easier: I was talking about the *review
process*. That can take *ages*. Secondly, this is not meant to replace
packages, no packages are not at all irrelevant.

-- 
Regards,
Olav
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux