Re: Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Oct 8, 2013, at 3:24 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> People are supporting me plenty privately

This answer does not hold up to scrutiny as a response to Jirka's inquiry. Such an arrangement requires publicly visible proxies to be credible. An alternative arrangement is for your mission statement to be presented to the community for non-binding vote. But on the face of it, the above assertion is a non-sequitur consider your implied lack of transparency in the Fedora-Red Hat relationship. It's simply an inappropriate suggestion that more lack of transparency, that's merely in opposition with another, is the way forward.

Chris Murphy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux