On 10/04/2013 11:49 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
The main change being made here is with how we are presenting *The
Fedora Project* to the world. In the past, we've tried to be all
things to all people, but going forward we want to pick a few specific
areas that we will focus on (and market) particularly. The wide world
of Fedora software and packages will always be there.
Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that the
the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an utter and total
sheninagan on RH behalf as came apparent on last FESCO meeting
" basically if whatever they come up with doesn't work for RH, it's a
non-starter."
Sending a clear cut message to the community and people wanting to
participate in it so in a sense Red Hat has already presentedFedora
Project* to the world or at least it's view on it's community.
"Here come and join Fedora we will allow you to do everything but
influence or participate in anykind of direction that project might take
but we do our best effort making you feel like you actually are making a
difference"
I can understand why people get the notion of that we are nothing more
the a freaking test bed for RH due to a disgrace and disgusting
corporate behaviour towards the community like was shown on the last
FESCO meeting when the true intention of RH was shown with the direction
of Fedora and how much community gets to be involved in that decision.
What a disgrace and disgusting corporate behaviour towards the community
that took place on that meeting putting Red Hat on par with Canonical.
Truly a dark day in Fedora history that took place there on that meeting.
But I think Stephen for trying to propose to certain extent fair
proposal on how to handle the working group nominations
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
