On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > We just started to support ARM, I don't think we want to drop it. > > I guess those three products are currently most important and > > other products like Embedded should go into Spins category. At > > least for now. > Yes, we're probably not going to be offering a direct embedded product > right from the get-go. However, the Fedora ARM project will definitely > have a place in the Server and Cloud variants, as several hardware > manufacturers have been announcing ARM-based servers. Apologies for the necro, I'm catching up on this whole discussion. I really think whatever the New Way Of Doing Things turns out to be, it needs to include a minimal network install image much like the current netinst.iso, built for all primary arches, as a primary deliverable. Whether that's considered part of one of the 'products' or the 'base os' or whatever I don't know, but I really think it would be a huge mistake not to ship something along those lines. It is likely to be what a lot of ARM users want. I think having that, and ARM builds of the products so far proposed, should cover the bases - but so far as the Workstation product goes, remember that GNOME does not currently work well on most supported ARM platforms, so our 'ARM Workstation' is currently KDE. We've done a lot of work over the last few cycles to really bump ARM up to 'first class citizen' status, and a lot of that is coming together - I think reasonably successfully - in F19 and F20. It would be rather odd to go with a change for F21 or F22 which goes in the opposite direction. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
