On 08/29/2013 01:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300 > Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ...snip... > >> Let me say AWESOME one more time :) > > :) > > I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you > folks. ;( > > Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling > faster. > >>> Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's >>> breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too. >> >> Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for >> overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some >> extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting >> scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about pushing >> potentially destabilizing updates :) > > Exactly. > > kevin > I'm not saying this was a bad idea, but the Koji developers now have to test on both RHEL 6 and Fedora now. Let this message serve as a warning to them if they did not already know. ;) - Jay -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
