-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:59:44 -0400 Jay Greguske <jgregusk@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > On 08/29/2013 01:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300 > > Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ...snip... > > > >> Let me say AWESOME one more time :) > > > > :) > > > > I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you > > folks. ;( > > > > Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling > > faster. > > > >>> Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's > >>> breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too. > >> > >> Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for > >> overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some > >> extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting > >> scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about > >> pushing potentially destabilizing updates :) > > > > Exactly. > > > > kevin > > > > I'm not saying this was a bad idea, but the Koji developers now have > to test on both RHEL 6 and Fedora now. Let this message serve as a > warning to them if they did not already know. ;) Its been something i've been doing for years, testing my koji changes on el6 and fedora. Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIf8/EACgkQkSxm47BaWffE2gCgrQU2ykIvkM9OZBKeG7dxwg/i /dcAn3MK6IB4rhXdsIwHglz+T55yQtSS =D34I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
