On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...snip... > Let me say AWESOME one more time :) :) I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you folks. ;( Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling faster. > > Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's > > breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too. > > Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for > overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some > extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting > scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about pushing > potentially destabilizing updates :) Exactly. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
