On 29 Aug 2013 18:12, "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:05:24 +0300
> Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > Let me say AWESOME one more time :)
>
> :)
>
> I actually didn't know that this was so much of a bottleneck for you
> folks. ;(
>
> Anyhow, glad we can move forward and hopefully get things rolling
> faster.
>
> > > Of course it does mean we could run into breakage if there's
> > > breakage in Fedora land, but thats good to know and fix too.
> >
> > Yes, dogfooding on the builders can IMO only be a good thing for
> > overall stability of Fedora, even if it might initially cause some
> > extra hickups. Breaking the builders a couple of times and getting
> > scolded for that ought to make people think a bit more about pushing
> > potentially destabilizing updates :)
>
> Exactly.
I know we discovered a few issues in the last couple of years doing this with arm because of using the stable fedora arm release so I'm glad we're able to help :-)
Pete
> kevin
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
