On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:22 -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:04 -0600, Eric Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache > >> > in production on Fdora 17 > >> > >> I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the > >> downstream "enterprise" distributions are for. > > > > We've been through this rodeo a few days ago. There's a solid body of > > opinion that your statement is going too far. Many of us run > > 'production' systems of various types on Fedora. (All of > > happyassassin.net runs on Fedora, FWIW). > > And what are you going to do for security updates on Fedora 17? Live > without? Backport and rebuild everything yourself? I updated my server VMs from F17 to F19 on Saturday. Took about two hours to complete all the upgrades and fix the few buglets that showed up. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
