Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:04 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache
>> > in production on Fdora 17
>>
>> I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the
>> downstream "enterprise" distributions are for.
>
> We've been through this rodeo a few days ago. There's a solid body of
> opinion that your statement is going too far. Many of us run
> 'production' systems of various types on Fedora. (All of
> happyassassin.net runs on Fedora, FWIW).

And what are you going to do for security updates on Fedora 17?  Live
without?  Backport and rebuild everything yourself?

Eric
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux