Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:40:14PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup
> > company, their developers are inevitably using a different (usually
> > proprietary) desktop OS, plus a non-Fedora distribution on their code.
> > We're being left behind and left out. It doesn't matter how
> > theoretically great we are if we end up with no users.
> I don't see how your proposal solves any of those issues. You are
> actually splitting Fedora into multiple
> distributions which makes it even worse (more fragmentation, not
> really something you can target etc etc).

Right now, we have a unified system which we pretty much guarantee cannot be
targeted at all. It's moving too fast at every level.

This proposal is for a solid core which can be targeted by software stacks,
which can be targeted by developers.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux