On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This proposal is for a solid core which can be targeted by software stacks, > which can be targeted by developers. Oh, initially I understood you were aiming for a fast-moving, highly integrated core, following systemd's lead. Maybe I am projecting :-) Is your goal to have _less_ movement at the core of the stack? We do have a problem of missed opportunities at this time -- the kernel moves fairly fast, and allows for new and powerful features. If we have a small core userland that moves in sync with the kernel, there is a lot to gain in performance and features. systemd is an example of a project that has broken a bit with the ossified core linux userland. In my view, we need more such changes; carefully executed. Yes, everyone carps about change, including me. But they still develop for the winning platform, and the winning platform gets to be the winning platform by evolving. As I see it, that's Fedora's tradeoff. cheers, m -- martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
