Am 26.07.2013 00:48, schrieb Eric Smith: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 26.07.2013 00:22, schrieb Eric Smith: >>>>> I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the >>>>> downstream "enterprise" distributions are for. >>>> >>>> We've been through this rodeo a few days ago. There's a solid body of >>>> opinion that your statement is going too far. Many of us run >>>> 'production' systems of various types on Fedora. (All of >>>> happyassassin.net runs on Fedora, FWIW). >>> >>> And what are you going to do for security updates on Fedora 17? Live >>> without? Backport and rebuild everything yourself? >> >> what are you talking about? >> >> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ date >> Fr 26. Jul 00:33:37 CEST 2013 >> >> Reminder: Fedora 17 end of life on 2013-07-30 >> >> my calendar says that we are before EOL as well as upgrade >> of the 20 servers is scheduled for next week and since the >> internal deadline for PHP 5.4 rollout is on monday i would >> like to know what your problem is > > So if someone came to you today asking whether they should use Fedora > 17 on their production servers, you would say yes? > > Bizarre *where did i say this* i said we run *currently* F17 and if you would read careful you have noticed the "Apache 2.4" which was never shipped for F17 i really do not justify my decisions inside support cycles because *you* quote out of context and sound like "booh nobody is running Fedora in production" because *that* is bizarre with a @foedraproject.org address -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk) Datum: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:04:11 -0600 Von: Eric Smith <brouhaha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> An: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache > in production on Fdora 17 I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the downstream "enterprise" distributions are for. -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk) Datum: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:57:45 +0200 Von: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Am 25.07.2013 20:53, schrieb drago01: >> i saw a lot of (successful) competitors come and go in the >> past 10 years in case of our business and if we would have >> followed them bldindly we would have gone down the same way > > There is a difference between "follow blindly" and bury your head in the sand . > You seem to pretty much always opt for the later when someone mentions > the competition if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache in production on Fdora 17
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
