Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25 July 2013 16:59, Billy Crook <billycrook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Given the amount of time that he spent on the mailing-list fighting for those features, then it looks like a waste of time, that work has been done.
>
> Unfeatures technically.  He wanted to remove features from the Default
> spin.   Subtracting functionality is not a feature.  He wanted an
> unfeature.
>

No he wanted out of the default install. We have a badly defined
naming scheme which is causing confusion:

default install -> what you get when you put the DVD in and do a click
through install.
default spin -> The GNOME desktop livecd.

Spins are managed by their respective "teams":
default has been GNOME and managed by GNOME sig
kde is managed by KDE sig
xfce is managed by XFCE sig
etc etc

So I would say that the GNOME team is within its rights in managing
its spin. Whether it is named default etc is someone else's problem.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux