On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/19/2013 06:12 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:Perhaps not that' s a matter of opinion but to we should be able to compare it against the discussion and decision that was made when it was declared that rsyslog should become our syslogger over for example syslog-ng to see if it at least meats those standards.
Progress does not that frequently depend on removing older
functionality. Specifically in this case, removing rsyslog does not
make journal in any way better.
This is *not the same thing*. In case anyone here is unaware, rsyslog and syslog-ng are exclusive. ${Syslog} and systemd are not.
In anycase the fact cannot be ignored or denied that it is unnecessary to ship two sysloggers...
I haven't seen anyone asking to ship two sysloggers.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
