Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:06:03PM -0500, Scott Schmit wrote:> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 09:26:30AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Tools outside of anaconda don't have to force @core, which opens
> > those tools up to far more creative payloads.
> So where's that put kickstart?
> Or is the assumption that anyone who wants a more-minimal target won't
> be going that route?

Many of the outside-of-anaconda tools use kickstart too; they just don't
necessarily have the same rules for pulling in core automatically.

I don't know if that's necessarily a great situation, since it means the
same kickstart will do different things in different situations.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux