Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/16/2012 08:17 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Anyone running custom scripts to create container chroots, or building
>hypervisor images where post-install files are removed from the
>system, is more of a programmer and therefore less reliant on us
>choosing a good default for the @core/@standard comps groups.
I don't think "more of a programmer" is necessarily the right
categorization, but I think "not in need of specific comps group defaults"
is probably true.

Tools outside of anaconda don't have to force @core, which opens those tools up to far more creative payloads.

--
Help me fight child abuse: http://tinyurl.com/jlkcourage

- jlk
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux