Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:03:03 +0100
Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...snip...

> > 
> > I think it would make sense to focus on the intersection of
> > installation set for these usecases. And hence:
> > 
> > No SSH. No Boot loader. And definitely not Sendmail. 
> 
> Also, no kernel and no kmod for A, as that is provided by the
> container host.

That doesn't look like an intersection to me. ;) 

How about a separate group for containers, since the packages and use
case are very different than 'core' provides?

@core-container ? or @container ?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux