On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:03:03 +0100 Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...snip... > > > > I think it would make sense to focus on the intersection of > > installation set for these usecases. And hence: > > > > No SSH. No Boot loader. And definitely not Sendmail. > > Also, no kernel and no kmod for A, as that is provided by the > container host. That doesn't look like an intersection to me. ;) How about a separate group for containers, since the packages and use case are very different than 'core' provides? @core-container ? or @container ? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel