On Wed, 14.11.12 08:18, Chris Adams (cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Once upon a time, Thomas Bendler <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > Does an MTA really make sense in the core definition? The configuration of > > MTA is nowadays much more complex compared to the "old" days. Normaly you > > need a FQDN, you need a SMTP relay and lot other stuff more. So you will > > only get the mails off the system after a lot of configuration work which > > can, from my point of view, also include the installation of an MTA. > > Well, as soon as you have cron, you'll have things wanting to send > email, and even sendmail mail to "root" on the local system requires > some type of MTA in most cases. I am pretty sure the default should be to push everything to the logs. But note that in the container case you are likely to encounter a setup where you install the host host, and then add one container for mail, another one for web, a third one for database, and so on. If you do that it would be really bogus to include sendmail in the minimal set... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
