Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:07:39PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Yeah, that's a thing that probably could be done.  Bug again I'd
> like some input from people who have made the switch to these
> packages being mandatory.

Well, I think it's just that the policy for a long time that since core
isn't visible, default or optional are pointless. Specifically:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups#Core

says (right now, but maybe not for long):

  Core is not visible, so adding 'default' or 'optional' packages to it isn't
  needed. Boot loaders are listed as 'default' in the group so that they're
  pulled in by compose tools. 

That last part isn't even right. There's not too many packages in core, so I
don't think it'll be that difficult of an excercise to find the reasoning
for each.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux