On Wed, 14.11.12 17:05, Kevin Fenzi (kevin@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:03:03 +0100 > Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ...snip... > > > > > > > I think it would make sense to focus on the intersection of > > > installation set for these usecases. And hence: > > > > > > No SSH. No Boot loader. And definitely not Sendmail. > > > > Also, no kernel and no kmod for A, as that is provided by the > > container host. > > That doesn't look like an intersection to me. ;) Well, if you look at all the usecases it happens that the container usecase ends up being the most minimal, and hence the intersection of all of them. > How about a separate group for containers, since the packages and use > case are very different than 'core' provides? > > @core-container ? or @container ? Well, it would be weird that the "minimal" installation is actually not "minimal" at all, but the "container" installation is. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
