On 14 November 2012 17:13, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14.11.12 17:05, Kevin Fenzi (kevin@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:03:03 +0100 >> Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> ...snip... >> >> > > >> > > I think it would make sense to focus on the intersection of >> > > installation set for these usecases. And hence: >> > > >> > > No SSH. No Boot loader. And definitely not Sendmail. >> > >> > Also, no kernel and no kmod for A, as that is provided by the >> > container host. >> >> That doesn't look like an intersection to me. ;) > > Well, if you look at all the usecases it happens that the container > usecase ends up being the most minimal, and hence the intersection of > all of them. > >> How about a separate group for containers, since the packages and use >> case are very different than 'core' provides? >> >> @core-container ? or @container ? > > Well, it would be weird that the "minimal" installation is actually not > "minimal" at all, but the "container" installation is. I didn't think one installed an OS inside a container.. but basically copied what one wanted into it... eg running anaconda to build a container means you already went too far :). > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Stephen J Smoogen. "Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it." Linus Torvalds "Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
