Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 14.11.12 17:15, Stephen John Smoogen (smooge@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> >> How about a separate group for containers, since the packages and use
> >> case are very different than 'core' provides?
> >>
> >> @core-container ? or @container ?
> >
> > Well, it would be weird that the "minimal" installation is actually not
> > "minimal" at all, but the "container" installation is.
> 
> I didn't think one installed an OS inside a container.. but basically
> copied what one wanted into it... eg running anaconda to build a
> container means you already went too far :).

Oh, I wasn't aware that this is solely about anaconda-based installs,
sorry.

For containers a yum group for usage with --installroot= is the only
thing that matters. 

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux