On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:13:09AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Well, it would be weird that the "minimal" installation is actually not
>> "minimal" at all, but the "container" installation is.
>
> That would be weird. But fortunately, it's @core, not @minimal. So we could
> easily have @minimal, @core, and @standard, each with different targets.
Hm, the scope expansion happened rather quickly.
Can we, for now, restrict ourselves to things that an "ordinary
sysadmin" would encounter? That would, right now, mean anaconda-based
or image-based installations of full systems.
Anyone running custom scripts to create container chroots, or building
hypervisor images where post-install files are removed from the
system, is more of a programmer and therefore less reliant on us
choosing a good default for the @core/@standard comps groups.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
