Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
>> > Well, it would be weird that the "minimal" installation is actually not
>> > "minimal" at all, but the "container" installation is.
>>
>> That would be weird. But fortunately, it's @core, not @minimal. So we could
>> easily have @minimal, @core, and @standard, each with different targets.
>
> @core is what's shown as the minimal install in anacona. We could do some
> renaming, but having @minimal, and having it *not* be the minimal install
> in anaconda, sounds like a really bad idea.

We could have @core, @container and @cloud ... trying to fit multiple
cases in one group just wont work.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux