Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:03:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Is there any reason those two can't be split up? Maybe @really-hard-core > > > for the first, and @core for the second. ;-) > > That's basically what Kevin proposed several mails back, and I agree it > > seems like we have two broadly definable cases here rather than one. > > I think Bill Nottingham mentioned something similar too, although I don't > want to put words into his mouth. What I had suggested at one point was we have an 'image-base' group that is *really* tiny, that is intended to be used as a basis for creating images, chroot, and other things where you're not necessarily doing package management *on the running system*. So it would be: kernel systemd initscripts util-linux bash and their dependencies. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
