Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:03:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Is there any reason those two can't be split up? Maybe @really-hard-core
> > for the first, and @core for the second. ;-)
> That's basically what Kevin proposed several mails back, and I agree it
> seems like we have two broadly definable cases here rather than one.

I think Bill Nottingham mentioned something similar too, although I don't
want to put words into his mouth.

I'm open to the possibility, but I think using "default" instead of
mandatory for many packages in @core covers this distinction relatively
well. Then we have @standard for the next level.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux