Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 22:23 -0500, Scott Schmit wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:36:17AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Based on the conversation so far, I think the target is:
> > 
> >   - mandatory install of everything up to yum install from the network
> >   - default install of a small set of packages necessary for a consistent
> >     Fedora experience including minimal admin tools
> 
> Is there any reason those two can't be split up? Maybe @really-hard-core
> for the first, and @core for the second. ;-)

That's basically what Kevin proposed several mails back, and I agree it
seems like we have two broadly definable cases here rather than one.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux