Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 18:49 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 16:27 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On 11/13/2012 06:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> >> It might be worth re-evaluating whether that's realistic any more,
> >> >> though, and whether we're _really_ committed to finally replacing
> >> >> network with NM in some kind of reasonable timeframe.

> In the current context, a minimal Fedora, I'd argue that
> NetworkManager is overkill too. 

We're going round in circles, here. The post of mine quoted above - five
levels of quotation deep, 11/13/2012 - was a reply to someone saying the
same thing. Please just read back to there, and break us out of this
eternal loop. :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux