Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 07:10:21PM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> A thin client would probably not want to install openssh-server.

Bringing us back around to the point of this thread. :)

Thin client is one use case.

Server base is another.

JEOS cloud image is another.

We don't necessarily have to define @core such that it means only the bare
minimum (although I think that's on the table, at least). It's useful to
consider packages which might fit a broad reading of the use cases within
the scope of this SIG. For example, if SSH suddenly grew a dependency on
(picking on something at random) Django, I think we'd want to talk about it.
That's one of the reasons I think it's useful to have a broader target.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux