On 11/12/2012 06:03 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Tomas Mraz wrote: > >> On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:37 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >>>>> I think ssh has to be in the mix. Of ths systems I use/maintain/etc >>>>> very few of them are ones I actually have a reliable console to. >>>>> If ssh isn't there, I have to add it just to get the system set up. >>>> >>>> Yeah: if we get to the point where every real install has to add the same >>>> subset of packages to core, I don't think we've succeeded in doing >>>> anything >>>> except make more work for the whole world. >>>> >>>> A cron daemon and (at least basic) MTA fall in the same area, I think. >>>> But what about ssh-clients? >>>> >>>> Is there a reasonable yardstick rule we can make, or is it pragmatically >>>> best to just make per-package decisions? >>>> >>> >>> so - imo >>> >>> openssh-clients is required, yes - b/c w/o them scp doesn't work. :-/ >> >> Perhaps scp could be moved to the base openssh package then. >> > > Sounds reasonable to me. Not sure that's a good idea. "ssh" itself is also part of the clients package and should probably moved as well then. "sftp" is probably popular too. I think its better to bite the bullet and just include the clients package as a whole. Regards, Dennis -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
