Re: [@core] working definition for the minimal package set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
I think ssh has to be in the mix. Of ths systems I use/maintain/etc
very few of them are ones I actually have a reliable console to.
If ssh isn't there, I have to add it just to get the system set up.

Yeah: if we get to the point where every real install has to add the same
subset of packages to core, I don't think we've succeeded in doing anything
except make more work for the whole world.

A cron daemon and (at least basic) MTA fall in the same area, I think.
But what about ssh-clients?

Is there a reasonable yardstick rule we can make, or is it pragmatically
best to just make per-package decisions?


so - imo

openssh-clients is required, yes - b/c w/o them scp doesn't work. :-/

ditto w/rsync.

-sv



--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux