On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 11:37 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:29:34AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > >> I think ssh has to be in the mix. Of ths systems I use/maintain/etc > >> very few of them are ones I actually have a reliable console to. > >> If ssh isn't there, I have to add it just to get the system set up. > > > > Yeah: if we get to the point where every real install has to add the same > > subset of packages to core, I don't think we've succeeded in doing anything > > except make more work for the whole world. > > > > A cron daemon and (at least basic) MTA fall in the same area, I think. > > But what about ssh-clients? > > > > Is there a reasonable yardstick rule we can make, or is it pragmatically > > best to just make per-package decisions? > > > > so - imo > > openssh-clients is required, yes - b/c w/o them scp doesn't work. :-/ Perhaps scp could be moved to the base openssh package then. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel