Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 06/11/2012 20:19, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
oddly this looks a lot like the Ubuntu release cycle if you replace stable with LTS

Ubuntu LTS in about 5 years lifetime. Other releases have a lifetime of 18mo.
For now, there is 5 maintained ubuntu versions at the same time (the older is from 2008)

As far as I understand the fp, this is not what we want to (and can) do.


The cycle would have to go: stable, preview, preview, stable, and so on to avoid maintaining more than two releases at a time.

If it went back and forth between stable and preview, you'd have three supported releases at once in the second half of year two.


Yes, but I didn't find better ;)
This will make a stable release every 1.5 year. It will be complicated to mix with a lifetime of 2 years.
And extend the lifetime to 3 years is not a good solution (and will be refused anyway).

Matthieu.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux