Am 03.11.2012 11:35, schrieb Nikos Roussos: > In that sense, and from my point of view, if we had to rethink our release model and dedicate time and energy on a > new approach, it would make more sense to have an extended support release (providing only security updates after > 13 months) which is vital for the enterprise desktop market. THAT would make sense if there is a upgrade path between two LTS releases - let's say the cycle is two years there would be 4 "normal" release cycles and if features with the impact of systemd are startet after the release of a LTS you have the full 2 years to polish it AND many users would also use the current leading edge releases to be first a comination of both would be really perfect
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
